Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

DaveP

Active member
I'm working on a 93 Ty today, I know I have everything "right", it just doesn't stop very well now that I'm done. I drove DesertSy for 3-1/2 years with its Baer 4 wheel discs; it would suck your eyeballs out it. It's been several years since I drove a Ty with stock brakes. I'm pretty sure I've just forgotten how suckey they are at stopping the truck. I feel a big part of the dissatisfaction is the front brakes are too small for the weight, and that the quick take-up master cyl is prone to problems that result in mushy pedals.

My 91 DD ext-cab pick-up has 98-up dual piston front brakes that I retrofitted about a year ago. This truck weighs about 4,500 lbs at all times because of all the crap I keep in it for work. The rotor is 5/8" larger in diameter, the pads have appx 25% more surface area, and the pistons have less total area than the stock single piston calipers. I know the DD has more front brake now than it did stock because in a "surprise" quick, hard application it locks the front brakes, where for the previous 16 years it locked the rears under the same conditions, with no other changes. (The rear anti-lock has never worked correctly since I bought it in 1997). I like the brakes in the DD. It stops better than it did with the stock brakes, I found everything at pick-a-part, and the entire deal was less than $300 with new Chinee rotors and hoses. I had to change the steering knuckles, but MattW had the how-to in his 4-door build thread. It's as easy to do as he shows that it is. I still have the quick take-up master cyl, and the pedal is kind of spongy, like these all are, but I'm used to it. There is room for improvement, IMO.

My 93 Ty needs a master cyl. It also has functional ABS which almost caused a crash the last time (literally) I drove it in October 2013. I recently purchased a 1998 master cyl. It will require a bit of modification to fit to the Ty. The outlet fittings are on the inboard side, not the outboard, so new jumper lines to the combo valve are necessary. I'm also going to eliminate the BPMV and connect the brakes directly to the combo valve. I like the 91-92 4 sensor ABS system, but I don't have the parts on hand (particularly the tone-wheel rear axles) to convert it, nor do I drive in snow where ABS is of the most benefit. So it's out of there. I also need to come up with a simple sleeve to adapt the newer MC to the old booster. I'm hoping Jason will cut one for me at his work on the lathe. If this works out, we'll figure out how to source the adapter sleeve.

I'm going to fit wht/gry with the 98-up non take-up MC with an ABS delete for starters. At some point I'll probably fit the larger 98-up front brakes too. I doubt I'll ever upgrade the rears on this truck. I don't drive the Ty nearly as hard as I did DesertSy, the fronts should be enough, just like they are on the DD which weighs more than the Ty.

I know bunches of peeps have done various brake upgrades. Particularly "LS" brakes. In SoCal, the F cars that had them are getting scarce, and the brakes are the first thing to get taken off them in the yards. I'm only aware of Matt and myself having upgraded to the 98-up S-Series dual-piston caliper front brakes as a stand-alone conversion. It's simple, inexpensive, done with readily available parts, that fit inside STOCK 16" wheels, including the spare. Neither Matt's nor my 98-up conversions included the correct master cylinder that goes with the dual piston calipers. I feel that including this part of the package will make the conversion even better, because it eliminates the troublesome quick take-up master cyl that is used with the single piston calipers. I can't wait to try it.

Stay tuned. Comments welcome.
 
Last edited:

randy merritt

Donating Member
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

Good stuff, Dave. I am thinking about the brakes on my stock '92. Upgrades would be easy, and I don't think they would lessen the value of a stock truck.
 

Anarchy99

New member
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

I just picked up a Fbody set of brakes for the rear and I'm trying to figure out a good idea to upgrade the fronts as well... Let us know what you come up with, I know I'll be interested to see.
 

wildphil

I Love My Ty's
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

The brakes on the 93 four door blazer I bought sure has the spongy feel. I had thought that I didn't get the brakes bled well enough when I was doing brake work. Maybe that's not the case.

I have not noticed my Royal Ty having the problems you are describing. It seems to stop OK. All stock setup.

The black Ty has the camaro brakes on the front. And it stops great. I doubt you would want to spend the time it takes to do the work to install a set of those. A setup like you did on your work truck sounds like a good alternative.

I have all the parts to install the camaro brakes on the rear of my black Ty. But with so many vehicles to maintain. I don't know when I will ever get them installed. If I ever get to it and had another set of axles. I would let you have mine they are 92 axles.

If I had known you could have used a set of 91-92 axles. I would have removed them from the Sy rearend I had hauled off.
 

Don W.

Stab it and steer it
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

Well my initial :2cents: is hydro-boost with the pads that have on there now on stock calipers and disks. Disk wear is negligible. I don't have the pads part number but I can get it easy. I did the larger rear cyl mod years ago. The truck stops very well and the brakes are easy to modulate. With the hydro-boost The "feel" is different though. Have to get used to that. Now I don't even notice it.

Just looked and the inner pad is wearing about 50% faster than the outer but remember I drag race regularly. I use the "far" turn-out to help avoid heat and wear but obviously this is harder service that on the street.
 

wildphil

I Love My Ty's
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

Thank you for the instructions on getting all the air out of the system Dave. There is a lot more involved than I knew about. I will get this taken care of. I like my vehicle to stop well. I don't need to run in to anything.
 

cloneman315

Active member
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

I have to say one of the best things I did was the hydroboost. Just with that and the stainless brake lines updated with good pads the truck works perfectly fine for the street and the strip with no issues. Will hold just about as much boot as you can put on them. I would think with auto crossing maybe a rotor change etc.
 

Rexxenexx

Active member
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

Awesome stuff Dave. Let me know the next time you want to go to Pick-a-part. I want to look for another Explorer filter box to play with. :D
 

dgoodhue

BuSTeD 4.3
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

I was gravity bleeding my brakes last weekend and lost track of time and let the rear brakes section of the master cylinder go dry. Should I go through your brake bleeding procedure? I haven't driven my truck yet to test it.
 

dgoodhue

BuSTeD 4.3
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

I don't have the original 4 wheel anti locking brakes module installed. I probably should mentioned that in my initial post.
 

DaveP

Active member
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

I've decided to go 2nd Gen front brakes. This is a stock Ty, and parts are available, if you know where to look for them. I've been casually checking the pick-a-parts in SoCal for a few months, and 98-up 4X4 have been non-existent in the yards I frequent.

I'm currently in Reno visiting and getting some stuff done for my friend here. One of the things on the list was to change out the 246 T-case in her Yukon before the snow flies. I got a t-case from a local yard up here that her late husband had a long relationship with. While I was there I happened to think of my brake up-grade deal, and asked them about parts availability. I walked the yard and found at least 5 potential donors. I picked one with new rotors, hubs, pads, and axleshafts. $215 for both sides, everything I need, and they took it out, cleaned it, and even loaded it in my truck for me. The pick-a-parts with core charges are more than that, the parts aren't as nice, and it takes a full afternoon to pull them. IF you can get them off which is challenging without air tools, or a full roll-away of stuff available.

I was given a set of LS calipers, but they require special brackets. The go-to guy for these brackets didn't return my call, so I'll go with my original plan. Plus I KNOW the 2nd Gen brakes clear stock wheels including the spare.

I have everything I need now to do the fronts and master cyl which is the first step to getting my wht/gry back on the road. This yard had at least 5 disc brake rear axles too. I may contemplate that upgrade in the future, depending on measurements and feasibility without making special parts other than park brake cables.
 

0966Sy

Code what?
I love my stock brakes, they perform flawlessly. Learn how to use them and they will return the favor.

But it seems like upgrading for no reason is the trend around here lately.
 

wildphil

I Love My Ty's
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

I love my stock brakes, they perform flawlessly. Learn how to use them and they will return the favor.

But it seems like upgrading for no reason is the trend around here lately.


You are joking. Right?
 

Don W.

Stab it and steer it
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

Makes me want to run up to Reno. However, since I race a lot I'm constantly pulling back down from 100+ MPH. A high of 11 times (once) to as few as 4. 6 being an approx average on any one night. I have some severe duty pads on there now and they are holding up well. They went on in Aug, 2014. I'd have to research the brand/type which I'm happy to do if anyone is interested. They hold well at the line, up to about 2600 RPM but I don't launch anywhere near that high. Above that it will want to push.

I do run hydro-boost which probably helps. I also use the second turnoff which helps. That's almost another 1/4 mile to slow back down. I checked and I'm fairly certain I'm on the original disks. Racing is over at the end of Nov so will be checking things at that time.
 

0966Sy

Code what?
You are joking. Right?



Ok yea I'm joking, they are not stock, I removed the ABS.

It's going to depend on the driver how long the brakes last and how they perform in certain conditions. Considering your stock brakes are up to "par". Many people work on brake systems themselves as the "do it your selfer" doesn't mean that if it stops better than it did before then they are in perfect working order.

I could see bracket racing a stock Typhoon could result in having a reason to upgrade the front brakes. But a stock Typhoon that is not used in a bracket racing situation falls entirely on the driving habits of the driver.

If you drive like a old fart who only knows go and stop and can't see a red light until it's 50' in front of them, then the brakes are going to take a premature beating.

Take a responsible driver who knows how to control his speed and the brakes will work and last as intended considering the system is in good working order.

I've put my stock brakes on the Ty through 16 miles of non stop circuit racing hell in Texas heat and have never experienced brake fade. Why would I insist on upgrading because I don't like how the pedal feels. Sorry but a mushy pedal is not caused from the brakes being undersized for the vehicle. You have a problem in your system, learn how to diagnose it, instead of just replacing it, another common trend.

The rear brake condition has just as much of an effect in the pedal than the front, the drums must be adjusted properly to perform as they should.

Quick take up master cylinders have been around for decades, and are still being used on new vehicles. The stock ABS is another exception for old technology.

Learn how to drive responsible on the road and not like a teenager on prom night. Upgrade them for a reason, not because pedal feels mushy or the Baer brakes would just look so cool behind my ZR1's. The brakes where not undersized from the factory.

It takes a lot of braking to heat up a stock system beyond stopping past a dime. No reason a daily street driven Ty needs Baer brakes besides the cool factor.
 

wildphil

I Love My Ty's
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

Ok yea I'm joking, they are not stock, I removed the ABS.

It's going to depend on the driver how long the brakes last and how they perform in certain conditions. Considering your stock brakes are up to "par". Many people work on brake systems themselves as the "do it your selfer" doesn't mean that if it stops better than it did before then they are in perfect working order.

I could see bracket racing a stock Typhoon could result in having a reason to upgrade the front brakes. But a stock Typhoon that is not used in a bracket racing situation falls entirely on the driving habits of the driver.

If you drive like a old fart who only knows go and stop and can't see a red light until it's 50' in front of them, then the brakes are going to take a premature beating.

Take a responsible driver who knows how to control his speed and the brakes will work and last as intended considering the system is in good working order.

I've put my stock brakes on the Ty through 16 miles of non stop circuit racing hell in Texas heat and have never experienced brake fade. Why would I insist on upgrading because I don't like how the pedal feels. Sorry but a mushy pedal is not caused from the brakes being undersized for the vehicle. You have a problem in your system, learn how to diagnose it, instead of just replacing it, another common trend.

The rear brake condition has just as much of an effect in the pedal than the front, the drums must be adjusted properly to perform as they should.

Quick take up master cylinders have been around for decades, and are still being used on new vehicles. The stock ABS is another exception for old technology.

Learn how to drive responsible on the road and not like a teenager on prom night. Upgrade them for a reason, not because pedal feels mushy or the Baer brakes would just look so cool behind my ZR1's. The brakes where not undersized from the factory.

It takes a lot of braking to heat up a stock system beyond stopping past a dime. No reason a daily street driven Ty needs Baer brakes besides the cool factor.


I would agree with most of your post. Two of my trucks have stock brake systems(minus ABS). And for me they work fine. Just like I would think they should.

One other truck has much more power. And it sees track time occasionally(rarely). The brakes on it were in great working order and it stopped well. For street driving. But when you are at the track and want to slow down from over 120 mph. I want a better braking system.

So far I have only installed LS brakes on the front. The truck stops a lot faster and will hold more boost that I need them to without any truck roll. Much better brakes. And compared to stock brakes. Stock braking is poor compared to LS brakes.

And I am going to install LS brakes on the rear. If I can ever get around to it. For the cool factor. Don't want to be looking at the drums on the rear. Disc look cooler.

I did have a 93 S10 Blazer with the mushy pedal. But I never had the time to try to repair the issue before it found a new home. The SyTy's keep me to busy.

One thing you should be careful about is your assumption that someone you don't know does not know how to diagnose any issue with their truck.
 

dgoodhue

BuSTeD 4.3
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

I think the stock brakes suck as well, obviously that is just my opinion. I think a stock truck accelerates too quickly for the braking distances. Upgrading my brakes was one of the best mods I had done to my truck and I am positive that it saved my Syclone from one accident. I had the stock brakes when I basically running an ultimate chip and it made me feel uneasy every time I went WOT, maybe that because I was accustomed to better braking. The brakes were on par with Grand National and 80's Mustangs, which isn't a complement. I am sure the brakes were better than the old muscle cars, but compared to today cars they are antiquated. My base engine Subaru brakes are about as good as my Baer upgraded Syclone. Todays performance cars put to shame my upgraded Syclone's brakes and most of them aren't fast in straight line as my Syclone.
 
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

DaveP,
Is your DD a 2WD or 4WD extended cab?

If 2WD, then did the '98 front brake setup move your track width out about 1.5"?
I've read that doing a 1998 S10 Blazer 2WD front dual piston caliper assembly swap will widen track width as much as 1.5"...

I owned, and sold, a 1998 2WD S10 Blazer but didn't get to measure front track width before I sold it as I wasn't up-to-speed with the 1998 'Blazer-only' 2WD swap details at that time.

My 1994 S10 Blazer currently has ZQ8 16" wheels on a lowered front (2" drop spindles & 2" drop coils - all Belltech) suspension which places the wheels just about flush with the Bravada fender cladding. I too have installed Astro van hydroboost and steering shaft and removed the ABS antilock brake setup.

If I install 1998 Blazer 2WD spindles & assembly my fear is that the ZQ8 wheels will stick out past the Bravada cladding.

Again, If your DD is 2WD, did you experience a noticeable change in track width?

Thanks, Pete
 

DaveP

Active member
Re: Stock Brakes Suck. My Idea for an Inexpensive Upgrade.

My 91 DD is 4X4.

When you increase pad swept area, and increase rotor diameter, but maintain the ratio of master cyl to caliper piston area, you increase the braking available at the tire/road interface for the same pedal pressure. Period.

Stock brakes are "adequate" because they are capable of locking the tires on dry pavement with pedal pressure applied by a driver of average strength.

I've seen some brake mods on here and on trucks that I wouldn't want on my car. Jankey, and IMO not safe. I vividly remember seeing pics of an LS caliper with the "fins" ground off for wheel clearance. Those fins are for strength, not "cooling". That weakens the caliper. If it breaks under hard braking, there will be a sudden loss of braking JUST when you need it most.

Unlike some of the stuff I see on here, I DO know what I'm doing, AND I know how to evaluate empirical results. There is no doubt in my mind that my DesertSy with it's 13" front, and 12" rear rotors combined with the traction of 275 and 315 tires had a lot more braking with less pedal pressure than a stock Syclone. That was the best part of that truck. The brakes would suck yer eyeballs out with less pedal pressure.

Lots of comments about hydroboost. I haven't mentioned it, and have no intention of trying it. To each their own. I can understand that hydroboost may have advantages in certain combinations where inadequate vacuum is available. Like in my Super Duty Diesel. But the Typhoon will be fine with a stock booster.

In summary, DesertSy with its old-school Baers demonstrated what a well-engineered upgrade is capable of. The secret is rotor diameter. In the DD all I wanted was longer pad life under the conditions I operate that truck in. Lots of weight, in constant red light to red light city driving. I did get better fade resistance at the end of a long hard braking from highway speed, and less pedal effort under general conditions. In the Typhoon I'm looking for the same better fade resistance, along with a better-feeling pedal with less pressure for the same braking. By having to push less for the same braking, the pedal will not be as "spongy", and the elimination of the quick take up m/c will result in a higher pedal. Empirical experience with the DD suggests that I will be happy with the results.

I wanted to do the LS front calipers with a 13" rotor, but wheel clearance is really tight with 16's, special brackets need to be obtained, and I've observed that the outer pad contact isn't always 100%. So I'm going with 2nd Gen, which has only a slightly larger rotor diameter, but about 25% more pad swept area. I don't drive the Ty hard, and stock brakes would be fine, but I want "a little more" as defined above. DesertSy spoiled me.

And it was only $215 all-in, and will be completed in an afternoon.

Thanks for reading.
 
Last edited:
Top