you think this will work?

E

E-Rue

New member
anyone see anything obviously wrong with my line of thinking?

aau.sized.jpg


e
 
myclone

myclone

Donating Member
IMO the angles of the inlets(or are those outlets?) is too severe but if thats the only way it will work due to other factors then it'll just hafta do
 
E

E-Rue

New member
its a front view. and the one off to the side is a top view of the flange
one inlet (on the bottom) mounts to the headers)
two outlets (on top) mounts to TWO mitsubishi turbos)

im dedicated to making this work.
ryan said he would lick my bunghole if i could get two stock turbos working on my sy. if thats not incentive........i dont know what is.

i figured we could get him to do it at the nats.
take pictures and stuff.

e
 
N

Nick NY

New member
E-RUE said:
im dedicated to making this work.
ryan said he would lick my bunghole if i could get two stock turbos working on my sy.
Click to expand...
Now thats what I call goal setting! Make it work, I am going to the Nats and I have a digital camcorder that needs to be used!
 
C

CLONE

New member
E-RUE said:
two outlets (on top) mounts to TWO mitsubishi turbos)


ryan said he would lick my bunghole if i could get two stock turbos working on my sy.
Click to expand...

Two stock turbo's will still leave you 50cfm shy at 15psi of my stealth. And i don't even want to think about the lag problems you're gonna have.

Wouldn't it just be easier/cheaper to get yourself a man-whore and get your jollies off that way? bdubb is cheap I hear.

I do see your logic though. The stock turbo is such as gem you want to add another to make it even better. Here are some suggestions to further improve your truck.

Two stock propshafts
Two stock tranny's
Two purple wires
4 stock motor mounts
Two heater cores
Two ABS units

Please also think about using those stock WG's for boost control, that should work awesome for ya!
 
M

MikeRenz

not stock
the turboes would interfere w/ each other that the angle you have it at. Unless you are intending on mounting the turboes vertical? Kinda tough to tell from your shitty ass depiction.
 
E

E-Rue

New member
i hate northerners that sleep around with m-lo

and i spell.....sooooooo much better than you.
what the hell did you just say?
i thought i was reading an m-lo post.

e
 
C

CLONE

New member
MikeRenz said:
the turboes would interfere w/ each other that the angle you have it at. Unless you are intending on mounting the turboes vertical? Kinda tough to tell from your shitty ass depiction.
Click to expand...

int main(){
cin >> turboes;
function fixspelling(){
send renz back to M-lo's bathtub;
}

cout << turbo's;

return beer;
}
 
myclone

myclone

Donating Member
get me some demensions and/or a blue print and I'll build it. I hate the stock turbos too but it just might work. Dunno till you try.
 
M

MikeRenz

not stock
CLONE said:
int main(){
cin >> turboes;
function fixspelling(){
send renz back to M-lo's bathtub;
}

cout << turbo's;

return beer;
}
Click to expand...
I doubt you could get that code to work without my help.
 
M

MikeRenz

not stock
E-RUE said:
what the hell did you just say?
Click to expand...
how are you mounting the turboes to this 'flange' you created. Will the turbos intake/exhausts run horizontally, as they are mounted in the stock formation? If so, the exhuast housing of one of the turboes will come in contact with the intake housing of the other turbo.
 
E

E-Rue

New member
no. no. no. no.

what you are looking at is from the front of the engine. get on your knees(your used to that) and look thru the grill and radiator and see the FRONT of the motor you tard. the flange will position the two turbos SIDE BY SIDE on the passenger side. compressor beside compressor.....exhaust beside exhaust. the downpipes will just Y into each other.

e
 
ed hess

ed hess

race or get outta the way
erue
I just gotta ask.
I see your dog is a member of S.L.O.W racing.

OK so whats the s.l.o.w. stand for. :D

ed
 
M

MikeRenz

not stock
ok...now i understand. I thought you just chose an easy angle for drawing the flange, not the actual angle you'd see by looking at it from the front of the engine.

1. would the weight of both turbos be a little excessive for the 4 bolts holding on your new flange? Or would you support the weight in another way also?
2. I would think you'd want to ditch the stock xover tube in this kinda setup for a larger diameter one.
3. How inefficient is the stock intercooler going to be for a double charge like this? Or would you feed this through a/a?
4. Are you planning on doing this w/ or w/o A/C?
5. Good luck changing your spark plugs.
 
canadian

canadian

sy in progress
i was thinking about doing this exact same thing a couple of months ago (i have the chicken scratchings to prove it).

my plan was to have one inlet like yours, but almost "T" the outlets so that two stockers could be mounted at a 45* angle from the engine. get one 2.5" 45* bend for the first turbo downpipe, then a 2.5" straight with a 45* piece coming off for the 2nd turbo.

once the two join, get a 2.5" to 3.5" adapter and run a 3.5" dp (provided there's enough room).

then, run either an external limited to 12psi, or two stock wastegate actuators at 12psi to keep the turbo in it's best efficiency range. the only math i couldn't figure out was what the output of two turbos would be. do you add the "cfm output" together to get total output?

finding room might be a problem, but i think it would look pretty sweet. reminded me of the tt setup on supras (?) with both of them 45* from the engine.

just my 2 cents
 
S

smeagol

Active member
hire a plumber, and then a psychiatrist... frickin' retards... why can't you just go back to NA v8's and be happy... we don't have enough crap underhood as it is... why not do twin abs and dual batteries in the engine compartment too 8)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top