Re: proportioning vavle
Re: proportioning vavle
The ideal front/rear proportioning ratio changes constantly because of traction available at the tires, vehicle loading conditions, and other dynamics, but can be calculated if you know the formulas and are an advanced math wizard. I'm not. So most of us are going to use "seat of the pants" feel to know if we got it right, or close enough.
The absolute goal is to have the fronts lock
before the rears, particularly at higher speeds.
If you want to try to understand this "proportioning" thing a little better, check out this
Master's Thesis. Beginning on about page 58 he describes the "optimum braking curves" and the dynamic forces at play that cause undesirable yaw-progression with the rears locked, but more controllable yaw with the fronts locked. The 5 minutes it took for me to understand this (why fronts
must lock first) made this exercise in learning worth it for me.
We also have the advantage of the mechanical linkage of AWD. It is difficult to lock a rear tire, because it is coupled to the fronts mechanically. The ABS system for AWD dumps the rear brakes circuit to zero
during an ABS-controlled event. So all the braking is on the fronts once the ABS becomes active.
Whether you have functional ABS or not, I feel an accurate assessment (road testing) of correct ratio resulting in front before rear lock up is only going to be valid with the front prop shaft removed, and the ABS defeated by pulling the 10-pin connector on the unit. If you can achieve front before rear lock up, and it 'feels' balanced under 2WD conditions, than it will behave optimally in AWD without the mechanical linkage masking a gross proportioning imbalance.
Some more food for thought.