Suppermotoman
Symone
Can I remove oil cooler and move filter to engine block without it causing any problems ,I will be using this as a weekend car and trying to keep it stock
Cheers Simon
Cheers Simon
What he said....delete that messy setup...
What he said....delete that messy setup...
I still have mine. Mainly to allow a full size oil filter. And it's easy to change. I crawl under unough as it is.
Old school: Why would GM install the thing if it wasn't needed? Also once the t-stat begins to open it helps to HEAT the oil.
Ask anyone who has removed theirs if they would go back if they could. I'd be willing to bet most would not. I have worked on BlackKnight's Sy he currently has and his old one. Block mounted filter is the way to go on a stockish build.
You act as if there isn't anything else on the trucks that "wasn't needed". GM wasn't a high end, specialty manufacturer who could afford to nitpick over every aspect of a potential model. Sometimes the answer is far simpler than that.....why not? It was SOE on base T-Series trucks, it does help (albeit very little) to cool the oil, it allows for a larger capacity of oil (4.5 vs 4), does not require the use of a different oil filter from standard T-Series trucks, and it was easier to change than an on-the-block filter with the front diff in the way. However, none of the these conveniences are *needed*. Deviation from business as usual would have probably costed more time/effort than it would've been worth. It's worth it us owners, now, 23 years later, but probably not GM/PAS at the time.Old school: Why would GM install the thing if it wasn't needed?
To me, there is a big difference in "unneeded" and "added to be added". Anatomical vestigial structures are often "unneeded" but I don't think the good Lord "added them to be added". Conversely, for 99% of the drivers, a rear spoiler on a car is "added to be added".Like I said, I'm old school. IMHO GM, or anyone else is unlikely to install unneessary equipment. Granted some engeneer somewhere in a back room may have "spec'd" the thing but somewhere that got reviewed. I've always had the opinion that there is nothing on a vechicle that isn't there for a reason. Styling, required safety, manufacureing cost or ease, you name it, but I doubt it's just added to be added.
Just my opinion on the "warming" issue as well. I'll defer to you there because I don't have an oil temp ga. Admittedly subjective but I've watched it happen in big trucks with both water and oil temp gauges. Their oil capacity is in gallons not quarts so the differences are probably easier to see. And in the older engines that I'm familer with the water through the oil cooler is "full time" meaning it's unaffected by the t-stat or radiater water temp. A fully objective test on oil cooler effectiveness would require, IMO, a stock cooling setup (rad, & oil cooler) on a dyno to simulate different loads and temps on a repeatable basis.
Anyway, I've been wrong before and will be again, someday...:rotf: But always the chat and differing opinions.