low milage vs. high milage
- Thread starter ty166
- Start date
JB's Red Ty
Still Green
Re: low milage vs. high milage
I have 28K on my 92 Ty and I consider it very low mileage, but others may differ.
I figure if it is still under the original warranty mileage, it should be considered low
I have 28K on my 92 Ty and I consider it very low mileage, but others may differ.
I figure if it is still under the original warranty mileage, it should be considered low
warmpancakes
New member
Re: low milage vs. high milage
15k per year is average so technically anything below that is low But I would say anything below 100k is low
15k per year is average so technically anything below that is low But I would say anything below 100k is low
James Thomas
"NO CLASS"
Re: low milage vs. high milage
I have one Ty with 46K. I consider that low since the avverage 91-92 has 80K plus or more.
______________
James
I have one Ty with 46K. I consider that low since the avverage 91-92 has 80K plus or more.
______________
James
White97SVT
Member
Re: low milage vs. high milage
I think I have like 58 or 59K now. I consider that to be pretty low. Not extremely low, but in comparison to other trucks that seems decent.
I think I have like 58 or 59K now. I consider that to be pretty low. Not extremely low, but in comparison to other trucks that seems decent.
Foot Performance
Donating Member
Re: low milage vs. high milage
i would say 60 to80 personally like they said mine has 34k and i consider it very low miles
i would say 60 to80 personally like they said mine has 34k and i consider it very low miles
dgoodhue
BuSTeD 4.3
Re: low milage vs. high milage
I think many people have their own defintion. One thing that happens after vehicle get so old that miles per year maybe low mile driven, but it doesn't constitute a low mileage vehicle. For instance no is calling a car averaging 6K mile per year such a Grand National (120K) or a 67 Camaro (240K) low miles. I consider a car with under 50-60K miles low miles. I could maybe even go for 60-80K miles. Anything over 100K most consider high miles even though with a 16 year old Sclone that is only 6250 miles per year. Their are few other categories of Ultra Low mileage. Their seem to a be quite bit of a spike when a vehicle has under 20K miles and another spike when it practically brand new around 1000 miles.
I think many people have their own defintion. One thing that happens after vehicle get so old that miles per year maybe low mile driven, but it doesn't constitute a low mileage vehicle. For instance no is calling a car averaging 6K mile per year such a Grand National (120K) or a 67 Camaro (240K) low miles. I consider a car with under 50-60K miles low miles. I could maybe even go for 60-80K miles. Anything over 100K most consider high miles even though with a 16 year old Sclone that is only 6250 miles per year. Their are few other categories of Ultra Low mileage. Their seem to a be quite bit of a spike when a vehicle has under 20K miles and another spike when it practically brand new around 1000 miles.
KFC_Or_Bust
New member
Re: low milage vs. high milage
My Braphoon has 257,000 miles on the body but the 93 Ty drivetrain only has just a tick over 50k miles....What do I classify it as? Some low miles, mostly extremely high miles?
My Braphoon has 257,000 miles on the body but the 93 Ty drivetrain only has just a tick over 50k miles....What do I classify it as? Some low miles, mostly extremely high miles?
syclone0577
Member
Re: low milage vs. high milage
I better drive mine less...795 miles a year is starting to really add up.
I better drive mine less...795 miles a year is starting to really add up.
jjorgensen52
NHSTE - I'm the only one!
Re: low milage vs. high milage
I've always figured low mileage for these trucks to be somewheres around <45k ... I'd consider mine high with 140k on the body (although the rebuilt tranny and motor have only about 2500 on them ).
At this point, I'm competing for highest mileage SyTy :tup: I built it to enjoy it, and the odometer isn't going to stop me
I've always figured low mileage for these trucks to be somewheres around <45k ... I'd consider mine high with 140k on the body (although the rebuilt tranny and motor have only about 2500 on them
).At this point, I'm competing for highest mileage SyTy :tup: I built it to enjoy it, and the odometer isn't going to stop me
Last edited:
alwayscode390
pppssssshhhhhtttttttttttt
Re: low milage vs. high milage
It definately depends on the age of the vehicle. I personally would say anything with under 100k is LOW SYTY wise ... if our trucks were used as DD's their entire life, they would have ATLEAST 192k on them ---
It definately depends on the age of the vehicle. I personally would say anything with under 100k is LOW SYTY wise ... if our trucks were used as DD's their entire life, they would have ATLEAST 192k on them
---
jjorgensen52
NHSTE - I'm the only one!
Re: low milage vs. high milage
mine was retired from DD service about this time 4 years ago... 52k in 4 years sounds about right
alwayscode390 said:It definately depends on the age of the vehicle. I personally would say anything with under 100k is LOW SYTY wise ... if our trucks were used as DD's their entire life, they would have ATLEAST 192k on them
mine was retired from DD service about this time 4 years ago... 52k in 4 years sounds about right