warmpancakes said:It's the wife's truck, if it breaks she can fix it
protosy said:i thought someone did some testing on this a while back... tookycat i think. he did some rolling resistence tests with his truck with changes in tire pressures.
cool. i knew someone did it. 8 years ago is a while, i guess my memory just doesn't work good that far back.sytyguy said:I did this back in 1999 with 1-2 psi changes in pressure until I found the best results. I had a compressor in the field with me and just kept trying runs, letting the tires cool, checking temps, and adjusting pressures. All runs were made under controlled variables with tires being the exact same temp (as verified by temp probe), same distance, and same mph. I was pretty meticulous about the test, because I actually cared back then(I had only had the truck for a year at that point).
When you own the road that you test on, it makes it easy to do that kind of stuff. :lol:
Hood
Ummmm.....yeah it does. That's the whole point of the aforementioned test that I did back '99.....to see just how less stress the driveline sees when rotational diameter is equalized front to back. It's significant and why, to this day, I ride with more psi up front than in the back.Also, doesnt the weight , front to back make a difference as well. The front of the truck weighs a lot more than the rear. Thereby flattening out the front tires, changing their actual height. Right????
The VC "makes up" for the difference. No abnormal wear should be noticed on diffs from differing tire sizes.Does having different size tires in the front and rear only effect the transfer case? Or would it also have an effect on the differentials front or rear?
last Pittsburgh meet i drove the sy out with 245 45 18 front and 315 30 18 rears and my t case didnt even make it out there. did the tire size have anything to do with it? dont know but ill be as close as possible from now on.